## Contents * 1 Making the Grade: School-based Interventions for Pediatric Anxiety Disorders: Primary data presented looking at which school-based anxiety interventions are most effective * 2 Intro * 2.1 Why do they go unnoticed? * 2.2 Why is anxiety in children important to study? * 2.3 Problems caused by Childhood anxiety * 2.3.1 Case Example 1 * 2.3.2 Case example 2 * 2.4 How are we doing currently? * 2.5 Why School Interventions? * 2.6 Results * 2.6.1 STARS * 2.6.1.1 Primary Aim: Compare the effectiveness of a modular CBT (MCBT) to TAU * 2.6.1.2 What is TAU? * 2.7 Conclusions & Limitations * 2.7.1 Is MCBT Better than TAU in Schools? * 2.8 Implications and Solutions * 2.8.1 Calm Study * 2.8.1.1 Follow up of Case 1 and Case 2 * 2.8.2 TAPES Study # Making the Grade: School-based Interventions for Pediatric Anxiety Disorders: Primary data presented looking at which school-based anxiety interventions are most effective[edit | edit source] Golda S. Ginsburg, Ph.D. University of Connecticut This talk was given at MICAMH at FIU in Miami, Florida. # Intro[edit | edit source] • Background: Why Anxiety? Why schools? • What is treatment as usual (TAU) for anxiety dx in schools? • Is CBT better than TAU in schools? • Expanding the network of school providers Children have valid concerns and worries during childhood. Anxiety is underestimated and under treated in children ## Why do they go unnoticed?[edit | edit source] * Not apparent and disruptive * Anxiety in the classroom is avoided * Try to adapt to the child and not put them in situations that cause discomfort * Care providers believe they will grow out of it or it is not serious ## Why is anxiety in children important to study?[edit | edit source] * Measurement of anxiety is getting better * Anxiety disorder is the most common psychiatric disorder- and is on the rise! * 10-20% lifetime prevalence rates * 2 in 20 students affected * 2 more will not meet criteria but will likely meet some of the items ## Problems caused by Childhood anxiety[edit | edit source] * Social interactions * Fewer friends * Little to No extracurricular activities o Less likely to attend events like field trips * Academic * Preform lower * Attendance is lower * Familial o Tough parenting causes tensions  * Babying- allowing them to avoid situations that cause distress * Causes parental conflict * Family distress * “Gateway illness” more likely to develop other disorders * Adult anxiety  * Suicidality * Other diagnoses ### Case Example 1[edit | edit source] Primary Diagnosis: Generalized Anxiety 6-year-old boy Key worries: * Making mistakes/perfectionism/changes * Hours getting ready looking just right * Upset each morning afraid of missing the bus * Hours on homework re-does assignments tears up assignment if makes a mistake * Seeks reassurance * Sought school nurse because of stomach aches * Missed school due to anxiety ### Case example 2[edit | edit source] Separation Anxiety 10 years old girl * Must be near mom at all times beg to stay home * Leaves bathroom door open * Texts mom during day and asks to leave school * Stomach aches each morning causing her to be often late to school ## How are we doing currently?[edit | edit source] * Less than half of youth received services * Likelihood of receiving treatment: 30% anxiety vs 70% ADHD * Critical need to enhance access, bring services to school ## Why School Interventions?[edit | edit source] * Takes away many barriers to seeking treatment * School setting can trigger anxiety * Separation, performance, social * Better generalization of skills * Treatment improves academic functioning ## Results[edit | edit source] Evidence-based Treatments * Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) * Medication-SSRIs CAMS: Response rates 60%-80% * 60% is one treatment alone * 80% is when both treatments are used ### STARS[edit | edit source] ##### Primary Aim: Compare the effectiveness of a modular CBT (MCBT) to TAU[edit | edit source] Modular CBT takes the elements of CBT but gives more flexibility to the clinician * 6 year RCT in MD and CT: MCBT (n = 37) or TAU * One day training; optional supervision * 12 weeks of tx Evaluations at pre, post, 1 year follow up The CBT Modules * Psychoeducation 1st session * CBT Triangle * Exposure 2nd session and throughout * Relaxation strategies * Cognitive restructuring “changing thoughts” * Problem solving * Relapse prevention * Meditation Most children had more than one disorder ##### What is TAU?[edit | edit source] * Primary therapeutic orientation (n=25) CBT 68% * Session summary forms (n=475) CBT 67% * IE-report (n = 90 sessions) CBT 14% A lot fell into the category of other for example: * Emotional support for feelings * Making holiday cards ## Conclusions & Limitations[edit | edit source] * School clinicians are thinking about CBT * The sample was small may not be generalizable * We need more training for school psychologists ### Is MCBT Better than TAU in Schools?[edit | edit source] * Anxiety severity * Anxiety did go down overtime and remained down * Did not differ significantly between groups * Global functions * Improved over time * No significant between group differences Cams was more effective than stars but why? * Lower dose (9 sessions for 20-30) * Limited/poor training and supervision * 1 day; optional supervision * Low MCBT quality * Key CBT element of exposure may have been missing * Lower clinician adherence of exposure * TAU- contaminated * Diagnostic report provided * Ongoing monitoring conducted * Prescribed # of sessions * CBT elements were used in TAU Cochrane report (2013) data are “limited and inconclusive if CBT is more effective over TAU” ## Implications and Solutions[edit | edit source] More training but there are limits because of funding and cooperation Expanding School Based Anxiety treatment ### Calm Study[edit | edit source] * Why and Who  * School nurses could help  * Familiarity with kids because of somatic problems  * Less stigma and beloved by students * Overview  * 3-year study * Intervention 1: CBT * 6 Calm modules based on CBT * Intervention 2: Only using relaxation exercises * Relaxation, meditations, and other strategies * Results  * Anxiety went down  * Somatic symptoms were reduced  * Behavioral avoidance decreased  * Automatic thoughts significant reductions ###### Follow up of Case 1 and Case 2[edit | edit source] Many of the issues were resolved or reduced ### TAPES Study[edit | edit source] * Who and why * Teachers, can easily identify problems * Overview  * Intervention development  * Open trails  * RCT * Why a school and home model  * Better communication between teachers and parents is associated with better outcomes * Trial run  * Reduction of anxiety * From parent, child, and teacher report